People v. Sutton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARDNER, P. J.
In this case, we hold that when a defendant enters into a plea bargain via a slow plea in which a condition of the bargain is the imposition of an upper term of imprisonment, the court, in stating its reasons for that sentence choice, need only give the bargain as its reason and need not give any other reason.
When, in 1976, the Legislature ended its 60-year-old romance with the Indeterminate Sentence Law, few tears were shed at the demise of that highly visionary, but woefully unsuccessful, effort at effective penology.
Alas, few hosannas have been heard in the judicial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re MosleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. EspinozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- In Re KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. SherrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. BegnaudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. GulbrandsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.