Legal Opinion
Fowler v. Louisiana Highway Commission
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1935No. 4945PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALIAFERRO, Judge.
Plaintiffs, the parents of Norman Fowler, deceased, alleging dependence upon him for support and • subsistence, bring this suit against the Louisiana Highway Commission, employer, to recover compensation. The facts in the case are nearly all undisputed. The main issue involved, one of law, is whether deceased, when injured, was “performing services arising out of and incidental to his employment in the course of his employer’s trade, business or occupation,” within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended), as interpreted, construed, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Keyhea v. Woodard-Walker Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bass v. Shreveport-Eldorado Pipe Line Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Boutte v. R. L. Roland & SonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Crysel v. R.W. Briggs Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Foret v. Paul Zibilich Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nesmith v. Reich Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Banks v. Associated Indemnity CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Hay v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Burk v. Gulf Refining Co. of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bacle v. Cochran & Franklin Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.