Legal Opinion

Wilkerson v. Deaton

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 9, 1989No. Civ. 6945Published

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAM, Presiding Judge.

The Circuit Court of St. Clair County denied Joseph E. Wilkerson’s Rule 60(b), A.R.Civ.P., motion for relief from a judgment previously rendered against him. Wilkerson appeals pro se, seeking in essence a reversal of the trial court’s ruling on this motion. Although Wilkerson argues that the trial court erred to reversal, he failed to cite, as required under Rule 28 of the Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, authority in brief to support his position. In view of Wilkerson’s failure to substantially comply with Rule 28, we pre-termit a discussion of the issues raised…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lokey v. STATE DEPT. OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONSCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. O'Barr v. Genuine Parts Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API