Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Twiss

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J. Where several carriers unite to complete a line of transportation and receive goods for freight and give a through bill of lading, each carrier is the agent of all the others to accomplish the carriage and delivery of the goods, and is liable for any damage to them, on whatever part of the line the damage is received. (Texas & P. P. Co. v. Fort, 9 Am. & Eng.

Read the full summary

Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J. Where several carriers unite to complete a line of transportation and receive goods for freight and give a through bill of lading, each carrier is the agent of all the others to accomplish the carriage and delivery of the goods, and is liable for any damage to them, on whatever part of the line the damage is received. (Texas & P. P. Co. v. Fort, 9 Am. & Eng. R. R. Cases, 392; Texas & P. R. Co. v. Ferguson, 9 Id., 395.) Where receiving carrier has to pay damages for neglect of connecting line, it has a right of action'…

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

It is alleged in the petition, in substance, that during the month of October, 1886, the defendants were common carriers of goods and merchandise from the plaintiff’s depot in Louisville, Nebraska, to .the depot of the C., B. & Q,. R. R., in said village, about the distance of one mile; that on the 11th day of that month one J. P. Young shipped a piano from Weeping Water on the line of plaintiff’s railroad to be carried to Louisville and there delivered to the C., B. & Q,. R. R., to be transported on the latter road to Plattsmouth; that the defendants received freight in less…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Bever v. NorthIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. City of Ottumwa v. ParksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Mason v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. City of St. Louis v. BissellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pfarr v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Davis v. Jacksonville Southeastern LineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Goldberg v. Sisseton Loan & Title Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. City of Richmond v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  5. Stearns v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API