Legal Opinion

Pfarr v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 14, 1914PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Crawford District Court.- — -Hon. F. M. Powers, Judge. Action to recover from defendant the amount of a judgment rendered against plaintiff, with interest, costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees, in an action brought against plaintiff by one Lee J. Chapman, which judgment, with interest, etc., plaintiffs paid, and they seek indemnity from defendant because of its (defendant’s)' wrong in selling it a barrel of kerosene which was dangerous, in that it contained a…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Crawford District Court.- — -Hon. F. M. Powers, Judge. Action to recover from defendant the amount of a judgment rendered against plaintiff, with interest, costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees, in an action brought against plaintiff by one Lee J. Chapman, which judgment, with interest, etc., plaintiffs paid, and they seek indemnity from defendant because of its (defendant’s)' wrong in selling it a barrel of kerosene which was dangerous, in that it contained a large percentage of gasoline. Plaintiffs, after being sued, notified defendant to appear and defend the action, but it…

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

On April 26, 1907, plaintiff was a copartnership, doing business at the town of Pisgah, this state, and through its agent, one Strong, it purchased of defendant, through its traveling salesman, a barrel of kerosene oil (Perfection brand). The oil was shipped on that day in an ordinary wooden barrel from Sioux City, Iowa, via the Chicago & Northwestern Railway, and arrived at the point of destination on May 1st. One end of the barrel bore the state inspector’s stamp, stenciled in the wood, and reading: “Perfection Oil. 2 flash tests 106 degrees. Apr. 24th, 1907. C. W. Kemp, Inspector. Filed-…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co. v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Scott v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. American District Telegraph Co. v. KittlesonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. Peters v. LyonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Rozmajzl v. Northland Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. Rochon v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API