Legal Opinion
Prouty v. Musquiz
Texas Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1900No. 927PublishedCited by 41 opinions
Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Maverick County.
1Opinion of the Court
This case comes to us upon a certificate showing the following statement and question:
"A negotiable promissory note executed by Cheney R. Prouty to James Riddle, payable to the latter's order, was transferred by the payee before maturity for valuable consideration to Sarah E. Eager, by delivery only, — that is to say by parol delivery without indorsement. Mrs. Eager assigned it to Rafael Musquiz. The above is a theory of fact presented by the record material to the case.
"In such case, is the burden of proof upon Musquiz, the holder of the note, to show that Mrs. Eager had no notice of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wright v. John T. Hardie & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
- Smith v. LivingstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Tillman v. HellerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Johnson v. McMurrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Word v. ElwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Pope v. BeauchampTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Walker. v. HoppingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Hill v. EngelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Daniel v. SpaethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Malone v. National Bank of Commerce of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.