Legal Opinion

Pena v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided February 23, 1989No. 13-89-031-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant has filed in this Court a motion to extend the time for filing an amended motion for new trial. We dismiss the mo tion, determining that a court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to grant the motion.

Tex.R.App.P. 31 addresses the times for filing and amending motions for new trial. Rule 31(a)(2) provides:(2) To Amend. Before a motion or amended motion for new trial is overruled it may be amended and filed without leave of court within 30 days after the date sentence is imposed or suspended in open court.

Tex.R.App.P. 31 is substantially the same as former Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann.…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dugard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Goode v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Sweeten v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  4. Cardwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Belton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  2. Licon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
  3. Rangel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  4. Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Guevara v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API