Legal Opinion

Rangel v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 6, 1998No. 13-96-400-CRPublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAVEZ, Justice.

Andres “Andy” Rangel was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to twenty years in prison. 1 His first point on appeal argues that evidence obtained during a search of his home should not have been admitted because the search was unconstitu tional. His second point argues that the trial court erred in supplementing its charge to the jury during jury arguments, and the third point alleges ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We overrule these points and affirm the conviction.

Pacts

Much of the evidence in this case came from accomplice witness Tony Soliz, who…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Munoz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  2. Klapesky v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  3. Licon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
  4. Shaffer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. Martins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API