Friends of the Payette v. Horseshoe Bend Hydroelectric Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge:
Two environmental groups allege that the Army Corps of Engineers violated the National Environmental Policy Act by issuing a dredge-and-fill permit for a hydroelectric project without preparing an environmental impact statement. Because we conclude that the Corps’ action was not arbitrary and capricious, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the action.
I
On March 10, 1992, the Horseshoe Bend Hydroelectric Company began construction of a 9.5-megawatt hydroelectric generating facility on the Payette River near Horseshoe Bend, Idaho. When completed,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. William G. Gordon, and State of Oregon, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Animal Defense Council v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Native Village of Noatak v. Edgar Blatchford, as Commissioner, Department of Community and Regional Affairs, State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,065 in Re Baker & Drake, Inc., Dba "Yellow Cab", Debtor. Baker & Drake, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Save the Peaks Coalition v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hawai'i County Green Party v. ClintonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.