Legal Opinion

Parmelee v. Hiller

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 28, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.

In this action the plaintiff sued for personal injuries suffered as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendant in the manner of operation of and because of the defective condition of the defendant’s boat. The facts that are essential for a consideration of the assignments of error pursued in the brief and that are supported by the evidence are these:

The plaintiff and several companions engaged the defendant’s powerboat and crew for a fishing trip. They set out in calm water on Long Island Sound and approached the Race, a narrow stretch of water with a varying current, frequently…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ward v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Lawler, Admr. v. Hartford Street Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  3. Fox v. KinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warren v. StancliffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  2. Ciarlelli v. RomeoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. Stuchbery v. HarperIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Gerrish v. Panama Canal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Warren v. StancliffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API