Legal Opinion
L.A. Conservancy v. City of W. Hollywood
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided November 30, 2017No. B270158PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRothschild, P. J.
*1033Los Angeles Conservancy (Conservancy) petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate to compel the City of West *1034Hollywood (the City) to set aside the City's approval of a real estate development project known as "the Melrose Triangle" project. The Conservancy argues that the environmental impact report (EIR) was flawed in its analysis of alternatives to the project, the City failed to respond to public comments, and the City's finding that a particular alternative to the project is infeasible is not supported by substantial evidence. The trial court denied the petition, and the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ocean Street Extension Neighborhood etc. v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Save Berkeley's Neighborhoods v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Save the El Dorado Canal v. El Dorado Irrigation Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2022