Kindred v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
Plaintiff, a former Navy officer, seeks compensation under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a) and 37 U.S.C. § 204 for his allegedly unlawful discharge from the Navy for homosexual conduct. This case stands on defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment. For reasons set forth below, we conclude that defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment should be denied and that plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment should be granted.
I
At the outset, it is appropriate to describe the administrative discharge…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Milas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Volk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Weaver v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Loomis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.