Legal Opinion

Kindred v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 9, 1998No. 96-43 CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

TURNER, Judge.

Plaintiff, a former Navy officer, seeks compensation under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a) and 37 U.S.C. § 204 for his allegedly unlawful discharge from the Navy for homosexual conduct. This case stands on defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment. For reasons set forth below, we conclude that defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment should be denied and that plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment should be granted.

I

At the outset, it is appropriate to describe the administrative discharge…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Milas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  2. Volk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Weaver v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Loomis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API