Legal Opinion
Loomis v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 7, 2005No. 03-1653CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*505 OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending in this military pay case are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment upon the administrative record. Plaintiffs motion asks the court to review two decisions of the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”). The first ABCMR decision, issued in 2000, reviewed a prior Army Board of Inquiry (“BOI”) decision which recommended that plaintiff be administratively separated due to homosexual conduct and conduct unbecoming an officer. Pursuant to the BOI decision, plaintiff was given a discharge “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions.” The 2000 ABCMR…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. McKenzie-AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Loomis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Philip L. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Cook v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.