Legal Opinion

Hamann v. Lawrence

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1933No. 21976. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On August 4, 1930, V.C. Hamann, defendant in error, (hereafter called plaintiff,) was driving north on State bond issue route No. 49, which is a concrete, hard-surfaced highway, with four lanes for traffic thereon. There is a gravel-surfaced road intersecting said highway at a point approximately one mile south of Indian Oaks, Illinois, in Kankakee county. This gravel road runs east and west. The Hamann automobile (a Franklin car) was in the outer or eastern lane as it approached this intersection. The value of this car was stipulated to be $1500. The witnesses with plaintiff were F.L. Bratt,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arms v. AyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Block v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Spiegler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Westfalls Storage, Van & Express Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. City of Chicago v. FrancisIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Investors Syndicate of America, Inc. v. HughesIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Graham v. DressenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. Protect Our Parks Inc v. ButtigiegDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API