Legal Opinion
City of Tucson v. Fahringer
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 1990No. CV-88-0469-PRPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Christopher James Westley and Lyle Goodwin (plaintiffs) petition us to review a court of appeals opinion that vacated a trial court order granting plaintiffs’ motion to strike the affirmative defense of A.R.S. § 12-820.03(2). See City of Tucson v. Fah-ringer, 162 Ariz. 159, 781 P.2d 637 (Ct.App. 1988). The trial court ruled that A.R.S. § 12-820.03(2) violates article 18, § 6 of the Arizona Constitution. We granted review to determine whether the statute is constitutional. Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Pritchard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Gosewisch v. American Honda Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Phoenix v. MayfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fidelity Security Life Insurance v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Romero v. Southwest AmbulanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Alliedsignal, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Michael D. v. Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Bird v. State Through CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.