Legal Opinion
Grynberg v. BP P.L.C.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 9, 2009No. 1:08-cr-00301PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
On November 12, 2008, 585 F.Supp.2d 50, this Court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint against BP P.L.C., individual BP defendants, and Statoilhydro ASA and granted those defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. Two motions remain pending in this case, both relating to BG Group, P.L.C. (“BG”) — the last defendant standing. BG, a United Kingdom corporation, was served with summons and plaintiffs’ complaint on June 10, 2008. 1 By August 4, 2008, BG had not answered or otherwise responded to plaintiffs’ complaint and the Clerk declared BG in default.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grynberg v. BP P.L.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Andresen v. Intepros Federal, IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Crowley v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021