Legal Opinion
Goldschmidt Thermit Co. v. Alumino-Thermic Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 22, 1926No. 163PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BODINE, District Judge.
Three United States letters patent, No. 900,366 to Hans Goldschmidt and Felix Lánge, No. 1,075,709 to Hans Goldschmidt and No. 1,153,435 to Felix Lange, assigned to Goldschmidt Thermit Company, are sued upon. Questions of unfair competition were raised at the trial. ■The patents will be separately considered in the order" of issue.
' The plaintiff company was organized in 1904 by Prof. Hans Goldschmidt, the discoverer of the alumino-thermie art. His miraculous achievements were before the Circuit Court of Appeals for this Circuit in Goldschmidt Thermit Co. v. Primos…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Esnault-Pelterie v. Chance Vought Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932
- Angel D.M. v. Kristi Noem, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, and Pamela Bondi, Attorney General of the United States; Christopher Chestnut, Administrator of California City Detention Facility; Sergio Albarran, Acting Field Office Director of the San Francisco Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office; U.S. Department of Homeland Security; U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Campbell v. WillettDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Diminico v. GEICO Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Reynolds v. DeBuonoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007