Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Willett
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided November 7, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00912Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 Damon L. Campbell, Case No. 2:21-cv-00912-APG-BNW 5 Plaintiff, Order 6 v. 7 Dean Willett, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Damon Campbell’s motion for appointment of 10 counsel. ECF No. 31. The Defendants oppose at ECF No. 37. Plaintiff replied at ECF No. 38. 11 Because the Court finds that exceptional circumstances exist, it grants Plaintiff’s motion. 12 I. Background. 13 This Court previously ruled that Mr. Campbell could proceed on his Fourteenth 14 Amendment Due Process claim against Willett and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Larry A. Storseth, 623435 v. John D. SpellmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Agyeman v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Garrison S. Johnson v. State of California James H. Gomez, Director, Department of Corrections James RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.