Legal Opinion

Lansdale v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 2, 1929No. A-6842PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter for convenience referred to as the defendant, was convicted in the district court of Atoka county on a charge of stealing hogs, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for two years. Motion for new trial was filed, considered, and overruled, exceptions saved, and the case appealed to this court.

The substance of the state’s testimony is as follows:

O. T. Armstrong stated he knew the defendant, Jim Lansdale; that on or about the 17th day of February, 1927, he lost four hogs. Witness described the hogs, and stated the hogs ranged over on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. McSpadden v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Rugless v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Linde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Watkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API