United California Bank v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
Under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 in effect during the years in question, taxpayers, including decedents’ estates,1 with net long-term capital gains exceeding net short-term capital losses, paid either a “normal” income tax calculated by applying ordinary graduated rates to taxable income computed with a 50% capital-gains deduction permitted by § 1202 of the Code or, if it was a lesser sum, the alternative tax calculated as directed by § 1201 (b).2 Under *183the latter section the taxable income for normal tax purposes was first reduced by the portion of the capital gain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Freuler v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Foster Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Walter M. Weil and Adele D. Weil v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Chartier Real Estate Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
- Chartier Real Estate Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Estate of Ernst N. Petschek, Deceased, Thomas H. Petschek and Asher Lans, Executors v. The Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Estate of Petschek v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Beach v. Western Medical Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Union Planters National Bank v. DedmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Stevenson Co-Ply, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.