Legal Opinion

Chartier Real Estate Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Three Cases)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 29, 1970No. 7513-15_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

The decisions of the Tax Court are affirmed, essentially on its opinion. 52 T.C. 346 (1969). So far as the year 1962 is concerned the result of what seems the prima facie meaning of the statute does not even appear unreasonable. It does not seem inappropriate to place a floor at the alternate tax, leaving unused losses to their carryover utility, if any. Correspondingly, as to 1965, we do not fault the Tax Court’s conclusion that in section 172(b) (2), “ ‘taxable income’ means that taxable income to which the loss is actually applied in computing actual tax liability.” No useful purpose would…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chartier Real Estate Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Mobile Steel Company, Debtor. Elaine E. Benjamin v. Lester Y. Diamond, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Mobile Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Lone Manor Farms, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  3. Pesch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  4. Continental Equities, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Foster Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API