Legal Opinion

S. S. M. Realty Co. v. Boren

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

The plaintiff prevailed in the court below on the contention that the calls in its deed, as shown by an actual survey, cover the wall and stairway in question. Reed v. Schenck, 13 N. C., 415. The law is, however, that when tenants in common, with a view to executing divisional deeds, go upon the premises and establish a dividing line, and deeds are thereupon made, intending to divide the land according to the division agreed upon, and they thereafter deal with the land with reference to said line, the boundary thus established will estop them and their privies from claiming a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cherry v. Slade's AdministratorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1819
  2. Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Baxter v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Cox v. . McGowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Buckner v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brumley v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Brumley v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Campbell v. WeisbrodIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Yopp v. . AmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API