Legal Opinion

Gunnison-Fayette Canal Company v. Roberts

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1961No. 9081Published

1Opinion of the Court

12 Utah 2d 153 (1961)

364 P.2d 103

GUNNISON-FAYETTE CANAL COMPANY, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,

v.

HOWARD ROBERTS AND F. DWIGHT MALMGREN, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

No. 9081.

Supreme Court of Utah.

July 26, 1961.

McKay and Burton, Salt Lake City, for appellants.

Christenson, Novak, Paulson & Taylor, Salt Lake City, for respondent.

McDONOUGH, Justice.

Plaintiff commenced the action below to recover from the defendants their pro rata share of the expenses for the operation and maintenance of a canal which the parties used jointly. The case was tried to the court without a jury and from an adverse judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cole v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gunnison-Fayette Canal Company v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Minersville Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Rocky Ford Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. West Union Canal Co. v. ThornleyUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Peterson v. Sevier Valley Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API