Swift v. Mulkey
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Multnomah County.
1Opinion of the CourtStkahan, J.
This is an action to recover 120 acres of land, situate in Multnomah County.
The answer denied the allegations of the complaint, — ■ which was in the usual form, — and then alleged that the defendants owned the demanded premises as tenants in common. The answer further alleged an adverse possession by the defendants for more than ten years next *533before the commencement of this action. The. reply denied the new matter contained in the answer. A trial in the court below resulted in a, verdict and judgment in favor of the defendants, from which the plaintiff has appealed. The appellant’s notice of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Pillow v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Wright v. MattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Lucas v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Morris v. C., B. & Q. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Eggart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
- Philbin v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- Herbert v. DufurOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Martin v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Schlageter v. GudeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.