Legal Opinion
Saltzman v. Pella Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 4, 2009No. 06 C 4481PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES B. ZAGEL, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff window owners filed suit individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated against Defendant Pella alleging fraudulent concealment of an inherent product defect. Plaintiffs are owners of structures with Pella ProLine windows, which they allege have an inherent design defect *474“that has or will result in rot of the wood components which reduces the windows’ useful life to as little as three years.” Plaintiffs allege that Defendant manufacturer Pella Corporation and Defendant reseller Pella Windows and…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Critchfield Physical Therapy v. Taranto Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- In re Fluidmaster, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Valentine v. WideOpen West Finance, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- In re Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Corporation Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Allen v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.