Legal Opinion
In re Fluidmaster, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 3, 2016No. Case No. 1:14-cv-05696; MDL No. 2575PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*944MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge
Before the Court is Defendant Fluid-master’s motion to dismiss [136]. For the *945reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion [136] is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background1
This multi-district litigation relates to an allegedly faulty plumbing product designed and manufactured by Defendant Fluidmas-ter, Inc., a California company. The part in question is a called a NO-BURST water supply line, which is a short (usually 12‘ or 20‘ in length), flexible hose used to connect water piping to plumbing fixtures (e.g.,…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mission Measurement Corp. v. Blackbaud, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Beck v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- City of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- Mission Measurement Corp. v. Blackbaud, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- Siegel v. HSBC Holdings, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.