Legal Opinion

Koulouris v. Chalmers

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 3, 1991No. 89 C 0734Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Tom Koulouris brought this five-count action charging defendants Hymen Paul Chalmers, Andy Nanos, and Electronics Missiles &. Communications, Inc. (“EMC”) with violations of § 10(b) of the *100Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (Count 1), § 20 of the 1934 Act (Count III), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (Count V), common-law fraud (Count II), and accomplice liability (Count IV). On August 15, 1989, we denied defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings on Counts I, III and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Welch III v. Cadre CapitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Fleming Landfill, Inc. v. GarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Sylvia Evans v. City of Chicago, Bertha Balark v. City of Chicago, Curtis Collum, Cross-Appellants v. City of Chicago, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API