Legal Opinion

Holly v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1943No. 29350PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The question of law presented in this case is as follows:

Are the dependents of an employee, resident of Pennsylvania, fatally injured in Ohio in the course of his employment under a contract entered into in Pennsylvania with a Pennsylvania corporation for services to be performed indiscriminately in interstate and intrastate commerce, entitled to participate in the Ohio state insurance fund (workmen’s.compensation fund) although the injury was sustained while the employee was performing service exclusively interstate in character?

As more concisely stated by the Industrial Commission, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Matter of Jensen v. . Southern Pacific Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Bradley v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Hall v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McBride v. Coble Express, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Collins v. American Buslines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hammonds v. Freymiller Trucking, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Dotson v. Com Trans, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Wartman v. Anchor Motor Freight Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API