Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Corvallis v. Pi Kappa Phi

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 15, 2018No. A161263Published

1ConcurrenceAoyagi, J.

The majority holds that the City of Corvallis's teenage-party ordinance is preempted by state law because the legislature made a "deliberate choice" to include a mental-state requirement in the statute. City of Corvallis v. Pi Kappa Phi , 293 Or. App. 319, 330-31, 428 P.3d 905 (2018). In my view, in both this case and others, we are applying too low a bar for implicit preemption under City of Portland v. Jackson , 316 Or. 143, 850 P.2d 1093 (1993). At the same time, I am compelled to agree with the majority's conclusion that, under our existing case law, the ordinance is unconstitutional.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. City of Portland v. LodiOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. City of Eugene v. KrukCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API