Legal Opinion

Garrison S. Johnson v. State of California James H. Gomez, Director, Department of Corrections James Rowland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2000No. 98-55302PublishedCited by 185 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Garrison Johnson, is a prisoner incarcerated in the State of California. He filed the instant suit claiming that the California Department of Corrections (“CDC”) violated his constitutional rights by segregating inmates according to race and extorting money from inmates by overcharging for telephone use. This is an appeal from the district court’s order granting the State’s motion to dismiss on grounds that the action is time-barred and otherwise fails to state a claim.

I.Facts and Procedural History

Garrison Johnson filed the instant suit pro se, asserting causes of action under 42…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by185 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Douglas v. NoelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Brand v. MotleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Madero Pouncil v. James TiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Juan Valdez v. Mark A. Rosenbaum Al Terrault Julie Latuska Bill Parker George Gore Debbie Miller Allen CooperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API