Tuttle v. Howe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The plaintiff in this case, being the assignee of a material man, brings suit in the District Court for Olmsted County, against the persons to whom the materials were furnished, and other parties in interest, to enforce the lien, &c., under the statute, and he appeals from the judgment of that Court denying the relief sought. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
*146 By the Court.
Beeby, 3.
The Court below found that on the 20th October, 1866, Kate 0. Howe held and owned a school land certificate, and that at that time she with her husband and co-defendant Lewis S. Howe, was in possession of the land described in such certificate, against a part of which the plaintiff seeks to enforce a lien ; that E. and E. Whitcomb at said time sold and delivered to Kate C. Howe 24,270 brick, for which she agreed to pay $194.20; that said brick were used by said Kate to build a house on the land aforesaid, and that said house was built for, and occupied as a homestead of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People ex rel. Stanton v. Tioga C. P.New York Supreme Court · 1837
- Carpenter v. LeonardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- Pond v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
- Rich v. RichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
3Cited by23 opinions
- Skyrme v. Occidental Mill & Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Midland Railway Co. v. WilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Kinney v. Duluth Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Duncan v. HawnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Gage v. NeblettTexas Supreme Court · 1882
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.