Legal Opinion

Rich v. Starbuck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Wayne Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The question presented in' the record is, whether the instrument which is the foundation of the action was so far executed as to permit the appellee to maintain an action thereon in his own name as bearer and bona fide holder.

The instrument sued upon is as follows:

“ $655.00. Union City, Indiana, Feb. 5th, 1870.,
“ Ninety days after date we jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of--, at the First National Bank of Union City, six hundred and fifty-five dollars, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws, and if not paid when due, the drawers and indorsers waive…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Douglass v. WilkesonNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Brown v. GilmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  3. Moore v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Bowers v. HeadenIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Wilson v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Egbert v. EgbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Harding v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Peretzman v. BorochoffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API