Legal Opinion

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant, convicted of selling a vial of crack to an undercover officer for five dollars, has not preserved his claim that he was prejudiced at trial by proof of other crimes. Although he did object at trial to the proof of "citizens’ complaints” on the ground of irrelevance, such constituted limited background material that was admissible to explain why the team chose to conduct a buy-and-bust operation in the area where it came upon defendant (People v Colon, 172 AD2d 173, 174, affd 78 NY2d 998). In any event, the complaints were not linked to defendant, and in light of the evidence of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. VailsNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. CrandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. SilenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API