Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

*227OPINION OF THE COURT

John Cataldo, J.

Defendant’s motion for inspection of the grand jury minutes is granted, upon consent of the People, who have submitted them for in camera review. Following the inspection, the presentation is found to be legally sufficient.

In this case, unlike the standard grand jury presentation, the charges against the defendant were joined with those of approximately 30 defendants. Accordingly, in light of the unusual nature of this presentation, a detailed CPL 210.35 (5) analysis follows.

The defendant’s case was a part of a presentation labeled by the People as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. HustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. LancasterNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. AdessaNew York Court of Appeals · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API