Legal Opinion
Jerome A. Maher and John R. Gravee v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 19, 2002No. 01-5076PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Jerome A. Maher (“Maher”) and John R. Gravee (“Gravee”) appeal from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing their complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Maher v. United States, 48 Fed.Cl. 585 (2001). Because Maher and Gravee have failed to allege any set of facts which if true would establish privity of contract with the government, an implied-in-fact contract with the government, or that they were third-party beneficiaries of a contract with the government, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
This case is a Winstar-related…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Estes Express Lines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- La Van v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Caldwell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.