Young v. Mall Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover damages caused to her lot and building by reason of the excavation for the foundation of a building on the adjoining lot, owned by one of the defendants. She bases her right of recovery principally on an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis. Defendants attack the ordinance as void and unconstitutional..
The ordinance provides:
“All excavations for buildings shall be properly guarded and protected by the person, persons or corporations causing the same to be made, so as to prevent the same from becoming dangerous to life or limb, and shall be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Gilmore v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Bissell v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Schultz v. BowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mullan v. HackerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Sime v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- In re Individual 35W Bridge LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Tillson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Braun v. HamackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.