Legal Opinion

Braun v. Hamack

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1940No. 32,097PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 289 N.W. 553. On March 15, 1937, plaintiff commenced excavating on a lot in the city of Minneapolis thereby causing a building on an adjacent lot owned by defendant and the soil thereunder to start collapsing. The building inspector of the city of Minneapolis ordered defendant to build a foundation under the structure and to brace and support the building and ground. Plaintiff notified defendant of the condition resulting from the excavation, demanded proper protection, and offered free entry on his premises for that purpose. Defendant having refused, plaintiff braced and shored…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Gilmore v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Bissell v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hickman v. WellauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Christensen v. MannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duenow v. LindemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Sime v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Galante v. Oz, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Noone v. PriceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Sagl v. HirtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API