Legal Opinion

Esplendido Apartments v. Metropolitan Condominium Ass'n

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1989No. CV-88-0344-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Esplendido Apartments (Esplendido) petitioned this court to review a court of appeals opinion holding that the trial judge erred by not granting Metropolitan Condominium Association’s (Metropolitan) motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. 23, 17B A.R.S.

II. ISSUE

We must decide if the trial judge erred by:

1. Denying Metropolitan’s motion for JNOV; and,

■ 2. Granting Metropolitan’s motion for a new trial.

III. PACTS

In 1970, William Lyon…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Yoo Thun Lim v. CrespinArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. First Nat. Bank of Vicksburg v. CaruthersMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael Soto v. Anthony M SaccoArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Ormond Beach Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Citation Mortgage, Ltd. (In Re Ormond Beach Associates Ltd. Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
  3. Edwards & Jones v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSBDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API