Terry v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the CourtHarrington, J.
The objection is overruled. With respect to the first ground, the witness has testified that he received the proceeds from the sale of each car of apples sold by the plaintiffs and entered the amounts so received in his books at the time; that any testimony that he may give in response to the question, in case his present recollection shall be revived by his books, will not violate the hearsay rule is, therefore, clear.
With respect to the second ground, the question is not whether the account books of the plaintiffs, in which transactions with third persons are recorded, are admissible in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Loose v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Commonwealth v. FordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Davis v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
- Calloway v. VarnnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Bonnet v. GlattfeldtIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grossman v. Delaware Electric Power Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1929
- Katz v. Exclusive Auto Leasing, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1971
- O'Neill v. CoolesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1928
- Geralds v. ChamplinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
- Robinson v. BurtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1858