Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Delaware Electric Power Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 3, 1929No. 141PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*524At a later date the trial Judge filed the following opinion in connection with his ruling:

Harrington, J.:

The objection of the plaintiff’s attorney raised two questions:

1. Was the Leah Grossman, who was examined by Dr. Charles M. Glassmire at the Presbyterian Hospital in Philadelphia in 1927 the same Leah Grossman, whose Administrator is the plaintiff in this action?

2. Though the person so examined was the same person whose Administrator is the plaintiff in this action, were the hospital records offered admissible in evidence, or should they be rejected under the hearsay rule?

While I will not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nicholls v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Blackburn v. CrawfordsSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Delaney v. Framingham Gas, Fuel & Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Davis v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
  5. Weaver v. LeimanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. Watts v. Delaware Coach Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1948
  3. Cheswold Volunteer Fire Co. v. Lambertson Construction Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. A. H. Angerstein, Inc. v. JankowskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1962
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API