Grossman v. Hudspeth County Conservation & Reclamation Dist. No. 1
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
Grossman, Campbell, and Handyside, being holders of notes secured by a mortgage on the land in controversy, brought a bill to redeem the land from a tax sale and to quiet the title against the claims of Cooke, who has bought and possesses the land, and against the claims of Dawson, who also asserts a prior right to redeem as the transferee of the defaulting taxpayer. After trial and findings of fact, the court decreed in favor of Cooke, and the original complainants appeal; Dawson also making a separate appeal.
The facts found, interwoven with legal occurrences which the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Board of Comm'rs of Tippecanoe Cty. v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- League v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Graham v. CaballeroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Dwyer v. Hudspeth County Conservation & Reclamation Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935