Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Hudspeth County Conservation & Reclamation Dist. No. 1

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 21, 1935No. 7543PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Grossman, Campbell, and Handyside, being holders of notes secured by a mortgage on the land in controversy, brought a bill to redeem the land from a tax sale and to quiet the title against the claims of Cooke, who has bought and possesses the land, and against the claims of Dawson, who also asserts a prior right to redeem as the transferee of the defaulting taxpayer. After trial and findings of fact, the court decreed in favor of Cooke, and the original complainants appeal; Dawson also making a separate appeal.

The facts found, interwoven with legal occurrences which the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Board of Comm'rs of Tippecanoe Cty. v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. League v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graham v. CaballeroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Dwyer v. Hudspeth County Conservation & Reclamation Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API