Legal Opinion

Seneca Mining Co. v. Osmun

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1890PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel the respondent to file its articles of association in renewal of its corporate existence. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The relator is a mining corporation organized under the laws of Michigan. Its original articles of association bear date March 23, 1860, and were filed in the office of the county clerk of Keweenaw county May 11, 1860, and in the office of the Secretary of State April 10, 1860, and it was therein provided that its term of existence should be 30 years, and it has ever since been a mining corporation under the laws of Michigan.

On March 19, 1890, there was filed for record with the clerk of said county of Keweenaw, that being the county where the corporation carried on its business, duplicate *574art…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taggart ex rel. Mason v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Dewar v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Village of Mount Pleasant v. VansiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. City of Gaylord v. Gaylord City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. State v. KyleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Grayson-Robinson Stores Inc. v. Oneida Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1953

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API