Legal Opinion

Cowley v. School District No. 3

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1902No. Docket No. 139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Alcona; Gonnine, J. Assumpsit by Lillian C. Cowley against school district No. 3 of Harrisville township for the breach of an alleged contract of hiring as teacher. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The plaintiff’s action is brought to recover upon an alleged contract of hiring as a school teacher. She produced a contract in writing, signed by two members of the school board as it existed at the date of the contract, and offered proof tending to show that she held herself in readiness to perform the contract on her part, but was prevented by the school board. The defense relied on is that, although the contract bears the signatures of two of the members of the school board, they were not authorized to sign it by any action taken by the board at a meeting. The contract bears date the 30th…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Ten Eyck v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ludington Water-Supply Co. v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hazen v. LercheMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hall v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tavener v. Elk Rapids Rural Agricultural School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Palladium Publishing Co. v. River Valley School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Chalmers v. School District No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API