Legal Opinion

Hazen v. Lerche

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Mandamus.

1Per curiam

The relator claims to be a school teacher regularly employed in a school district in one of the townships of Tuscola county. The defendant is assessor of the district. The relator holds an order for one month’s salary, which the respondent refuses to pay, and a writ is asked to compel payment. Por cause against the writ the fact is shown that the relator was hired by two members of the school board, without calling any meeting of the board, and without consultation with the respondent or his knowledge.

Held, that the cause shown was conclusive; the statute expressly requiring the convening of,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. School District v. BennettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  2. Crane v. School District Number SixMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. School Town v. PownerIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. McLaughlin v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Graham v. School DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API