Legal Opinion

State v. Potter

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 24, 1980No. 8048-2-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, C.J.

Kevin Potter seeks discretionary review of an order denying his motion to discover the identity of a confidential informant. Review is granted.

The controlling issue is whether the trial court erred in refusing to hold an in camera hearing pursuant to CrR 4.7(h)(6) to determine whether the identity of the confidential informant should have been disclosed.

In support of his motion for disclosure, Potter's counsel made the following offer of proof:

1. On June 4, 1979, Kevin Potter was approached by an unknown male and asked if he could procure one ounce of marijuana.

2. This unidentified male…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. People v. DardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. United States v. Eddie Leroy AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. In Re United States of America, Socialist Workers Party v. The Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BaysOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. State v. MinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. State v. BaysOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. FredrickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API