Legal Opinion

State v. Fredrick

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 20, 1986No. 15396-0-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

—DaLean Monique Doolan appeals her conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act (VUCSA), RCW 69.50.401(d). She alleges that the trial court erred in denying her motion for an in camera hearing regarding the State's confidential informant, in admitting testimony about the possession of cocaine in violation of an order in limine, and in admitting evidence regarding money seized, a "drug dealer's ledger," and typical practices of a drug dealer. Doolan also alleges that she received ineffective assistance of counsel and that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. JeffriesWashington Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. MierzWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. CurtissCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State v. Woo Won ChoiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API