Legal Opinion

Martin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1983No. 17 Western District Appeal Docket 1982PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of Commonwealth Court affirming the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review’s denial of appellant’s application for unemployment compensation benefits. The sole issue raised is whether the statutory scheme chosen by the legislature to determine the levels of monetary earnings qualifying a worker for unemployment benefits1 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by creating invidious eligibility classifications. The statute applicable to this case required that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Curtis v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Nixon v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Fischer v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API