Legal Opinion

Payne v. Borough of Sea Bright

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 26, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBodine, J.

This is a rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue to review (a) the zoning ordinance of the borough of Sea Bright, and (b) the conviction of the prosecutor in the Recorder’s Court on a complaint of violating that ordinance by undertaking to erect a building for restaurant purposes in a district zoned as residential.

The first phase may be disposed of in a few words. The law is thoroughly settled that an ordinance will not be set aside on certiorari as unreasonable unless it is unreasonable in toio, and that attack on any part of it involving a penalty for disobedience must…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dorsey Motors, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Neumann v. Mayor of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  3. Chancellor Development Corp. v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of East Chicago v. Sinclair Refining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Harrell's Candy Kitchen, Inc. v. SARASOTA-MANATEE AIR. AUTH.Supreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. Metcalf v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. In Re MarkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Home Fuel Oil Co. v. Borough of Glen RockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API