Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Dahm
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided April 23, 1991No. CV89-L-342PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
URBOM, Senior District Judge.
Having reviewed ■ Magistrate Judge David L. Piester’s report and recommendation of September 10, 1990, filing 28, the parties' briefs on the matter, and the relevant materials and opinions from the state courts, I find that I am in agreement with the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned and supported analysis.
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filing 2, be granted, unless the petitioner is granted a new trial within 60 days after the judgment becomes final.
REPORT AND…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darlene SPAN; Jerry Span, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Patterson v. Von RiesenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Patterson v. Von RiesenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Sanders v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Matthews v. RakieyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.