Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Baker Ex Rel. Baker v. Saint Francis Hospital

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 2005No. 100,713Published

1ConcurrenceOpala, J.

¶ 1 I concur in today’s opinion and write separately to provide additional analysis that supports the court’s reversal of summary judgment.

I

WHETHER A SERVANT WAS ACTING AS AN AGENT FOR HER MASTER IS A QUESTION OF FACT AND NOT A QUESTION OF LAW

¶ 2 The core issue of whether the caregiver-assailant, while in the act of hitting an infant, believed she was furthering the master’s interests or acted on an emotional impulse of her own, presents an agency-status question of fact.1 There is ample indication in the evidentiary material used in the summary nisi prius process which makes the employer’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Wathor v. Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. Stumpf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API